Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Home RSS
 
 
 
  1. All of it.
  2. As much as I can.
  3. A little.
  4. None, I shop off island.
  1. Yes.
  2. No.
  3. I haven’t noticed any change.
  4. The real test will come during the busiest parts of the season.
  5. Other.
  1. Clinton/Kane.
  2. Trump/Pence.
  3. I’m voting third party.
  4. I’m still undecided.
  5. None of the above, I’m not voting for anyone for president.
  6. Other.
  1. Yes, often.
  2. Occasionally.
  3. Never.
  4. I shop at the supermarket.
  1. I support it.
  2. I may disagree, but I support their right to do it.
  3. It’s wrong.
  4. I don’t care; it’s a non-issue to me.
  5. Other.
  1. Yes.
  2. No.
  3. If not the whole preserve, maybe a special part of it.
  4. I have no opinion.
  1. Yes.
  2. No.
  3. I’m waiting until the general election.
  4. I don’t vote.
  1. Yes.
  2. No.
  3. I don’t shop for gas on the island.
  1. Yes, Republican.
  2. Yes, Democratic.
  3. Both.
  4. No, neither.
  5. Other.
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Just the expected summer growths
  4. I don’t live on the water or go near it
  1. Yes, it appears to be.
  2. No, I see just as many cats running about.
  3. It’s hard to say at this point.
  4. I haven’t noticed either way.
  1. Yes, as much as I can.
  2. Sure, some of it.
  3. No, but I’ll follow it on news reports.
  4. I’m not a sports fan.
  1. Yes, always.
  2. No, it’s not our business.
  3. Not unless it could affect Pine Island/Matlacha.
  1. Yes, I love it.
  2. Yes, I tried it, but didn’t like it.
  3. No, but I would like to try it.
  4. No, and I have no interest in trying it.
  5. I don’t eat seafood.
  1. Yes, it would make it safer for bikers and drivers.
  2. No, the road through there is way too busy now, adding bikers alongside would create more problems.
  3. I’m not a biker, it doesn’t matter to me.
  1. Yes, and I don’t want to see it here.
  2. Not if it’s properly regulated.
  3. No, it’s used elsewhere and I have few concerns.
  4. I’m not really following the issue.
  5. Other.
  1. Yes, they need the protection the designation provides.
  2. No, it’s time to reclassify their designation to “threatened.”
  3. I don’t care either way.
  4. Other.
 
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web